• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Jobs
  • Career
    • Cyber Security Training
    • Work from Home
    • Cyber Security Analyst
    • Remote Work – Six Ways to Keep Your Data Safe When Working Remotely
  • Field Guide
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Deals
  • News
AskCyberSecurity.com

AskCyberSecurity.com

Cyber Security News & Information

  • Home
  • Data Privacy
    • Gamers
    • Government Cyber Security
      • Legislation
      • Standards
        • What are the risks of computer security?
        • Medical Cyber Security
    • Social Media
  • Security
    • Data Breaches
    • Scams
    • Malware
  • Software
    • Apps
    • Web Browsers
  • Glossary
    • Cyber Security Acronyms
  • About Ask Cyber Security
    • Authors
    • Contact Us
  • VPN
    • How Do I Know If My VPN is Working?
    • Best Free VPN iPhone
    • Why Use a VPN?
    • NordVPN vs IPVanish
    • Private Internet Access Download
    • Best VPN for Streaming
      • TikTok VPN
    • VPN Porn
    • Computer Security Software – What You Really Need
  • Tutorials
  • ChatGPT
    • Does ChatGPT Save Data?
AskCyber Home » Cyber Security Legislation » The USA Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act

In our ongoing series looking into Federal and State level Cyber Security Legislation we reviewing the USA Patriot Act and how it affected Cyber Security.

The USA PATRIOT Act (USAPA) was signed into law in 2001 by President George W. Bush with the intent of giving law enforcement agencies a tool against dangerous groups. The bill was partially renewed in 2011 by President Barack Obama with the PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011, which extends the bill until 2015. In 2015, the U.S. Congress did not vote to extend the Patriot Act again and parts of the bill that were extended under the Sunsets Extension died.

However, the USA Freedom Act (USAFA) was passed on June 2nd which brought back the Patriot Act with some provisions and doesn’t expire until 2019. The purpose of USAFA was to place a limit on bulk data collection being performed on American citizens, which constituted a violation of their 4th Amendment rights.
Under USAPA Federal agencies could appeal to a collection of judges under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for electronic surveillance of a group or individual. A modification of USAPA removed the requirement that it be shown that said group or individual was performing clandestine intelligence gathering, that requirement became one of the several possible applicable criteria for surveillance.

The USAFA reinstated this requirement, and any agency requesting bulk collection, detailed records or tangible records must now show to the court that the data in question is relevant to the investigation and a clear, articulated suspicion that the induvial or group is working with a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. Section 110 of Title I of USAFA is written so that the act may not be used to acquire the contents of any electronic communication from the service provider.

Put simply, USAFA replaces the requirement that a policing agency must show a reasonable suspicion that the suspect falls under the provisions of FISA. This requirement puts a restriction on mass data collection programs run by the NSA such as PRISM by requiring investigators to have court approval before being subjected to bulk data collection.

If an agency does acquire FISA approval however, the records that are available to them under USAPA/USAFA are extensive. USAPA allows agencies to gain permission from an employer or provider to allow the agency access to a protected computer, allowing the agency to bypass the much stricter wiretapping laws. Agencies can request call numbers, durations, the identity of who was called, as well as payment information, credit card numbers and your bank account. It also establishes that providers may freely provide this information if they believe there is a credible threat to “life and limb.”

One of the more controversial parts of the bill is the alteration of how wiretaps function. Normally an individual must be notified that their communications are being monitored within a set time, USAPA allowed that time to be indefinitely extended. The argument put forward for this provision by law enforcement was that suspects would alter their communication habits once they were alerted that they were being wire tapped. Previously a wiretap notice would have to include which providers and numbers were being tapped, under USAPA that information no longer had to be provided. However, this provision was struck down as unconstitutional as it violated a person’s 4th Amendment rights.

The final tool in the USAPA was Title V: Removing Obstacles to Investigating Terrorism, which allowed any federal agency to request an administrative subpoena. This subpoena compelled an entity (such as a business or internet service provider) to provide all records requested and included a gag order which denied them the right to notify anyone that said records had been requested. This was struck down as unconstitutional in 2005, and was never reaffirmed into law under the USAFA.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Our Free Newsletter

We Don't Share or Sell Your Info

Web Browsers

Where Are My Saved Passwords in Chrome?

Google Removes 70 Malicious Browser Add-ons from Chrome Web Store

Firefox 75 Reports Your Browser Settings to Mozilla

Categories

Cyber Security Field Guide

Computer Security While TravelingGet Our Cyber Security Field Guide - Available on Amazon!

Recent Posts

Security Marketing Manager – Remote

Sr. Associate, Cybersecurity Architect – Pfizer

Strategic Customer Success Manager – Cybersecurity – Opportunity for Working Remotely

Top 20 Passwords Leaked on Dark Web

ISU Cybersecurity Leader Job Opening

Cyber Security News

Top 20 Passwords Leaked on Dark Web

… [Read More...] about Top 20 Passwords Leaked on Dark Web

Apple Warns of Actively Exploited Zero-Day Flaw

… [Read More...] about Apple Warns of Actively Exploited Zero-Day Flaw

IRS Stops Facial Recognition System for Online Access

… [Read More...] about IRS Stops Facial Recognition System for Online Access

National Cybersecurity Alliance Announces Data Privacy Week

… [Read More...] about National Cybersecurity Alliance Announces Data Privacy Week

More Cyber Security News

Tags

amazon Android Apple bitcoin China chrome CISA credit card DarkSide DHS DOJ Equifax Europe Facebook facial recognition FBI Firefox FTC games GDPR Google Government hacker identity theft India iPhone Iran IRS LinkedIn Microsoft North Korea PayPal phishing phishing email ransomware REvil Russia smartphone T-Mobile TikTok tutorial VPN WhatsApp WiFi Windows

Government

CBP Looks to Access Airline Passenger Data

FTC Releases Cyber Threat Video Playlist

Malware Found on US Government Funded Phones

UK NCA Reaches Out to Youth to Deter Cybercrimes

More Posts from this Category

Footer

Menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Authors
  • Newsletter Signup
  • PRIVACY POLICY

Search

Why Use a VPN?

NordVPN vs IPVanish VPN Review

NAVIGATION

  • Data Breaches
  • Data Privacy
  • Gamers
  • Scams
  • Malware

MEMBER NJCCIC

New Jersey Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Cell

STAY CONNECTED

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Copyright © 2023 · AskCyberSecurity.com · METRONY, LLC

Go to mobile version